To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
2 Responses to “The Century of the Self”
We were both really impressed with this series when we first saw it, so much so that Laurie began lecturing about Benays to his students- I found it amazing that I had never heard of him, when he has had such a major impact. The ‘engineering of consent’ is a deeply cynical idea which is completely at odds with true democracy. Bernays’ rather evil genius was to persaude that democracy and free market capitalism were inseperable; Bernays’ concept of ‘democracy’ was a desire driven, consumerist one, that was unltimately passive, docile and controllable – he despised humanity really. One of the worst of his legacies is the switch from a needs based to a desired based consumerism – it has led us to so many of the problems we face at present. We are still in the grip of what he helped to initiate, and I think that now’s the time to ask ourselves whether we want to be ‘active citizens’ or ‘passive consumers’.
Attempting to control the irrationality of the mass in order to bring stability seems simplistic and fear-based, and it makes the erroneous assumption that the self-elected ‘elite’ who seek to control and manipulate society are somehow not suggestible to those same irrational forces. Bernays’ daughter described his ideal vision of society as being an ‘Enlightened Despotism’, and I thought it very telling that she saw him as a man who could not relate very easily to individual human beings – if you can’t percieve of the good in the person stood in front of you, then you are unlikely to see the potential of that good collectively.
There is no doubt that collective human force can be a deeply destructive thing but I believe that this happens for many complicated social, economic and psychological reasons; I don’t believe that it is necessarily inherent or the dominating foundation of our being.The answer to these problems is not mass control but mass understanding; a belief in the potential good in humanity; encouring folks to understand themselves a little deeper that they might function with a greater awareness in the collective. Democracy only truly works if we are all engaged and informed – now that really would have scared the pants off Bernays!
Thanks for posting this. I hadn’t seen them before and neither had I heard of Edward Bernays. Really eye opening.
Thanks again
Comments are closed.